Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Delirium | koala40 | 4-1 | None |
| Gruul Delirium | ryuji | 4-3 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Meta Performance Analysis
Violent Urge ranks #61 out of approximately 310 cards in raw efficiency (top 20%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 56.0%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Violent Urge is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 44.45 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 71.3%. Violent Urge has a win rate of 66.7%, making it 6.5% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cenote Scout | Creature — Merfolk Scout | 27 | 60.5% | 11 |
| Snakeskin Veil | Instant | 14 | 58.2% | 4 |
| Royal Treatment | Instant | 7 | 55.1% | 1 |
| Vengeful Possession | Sorcery | 9 | 53.8% | 3 |
| Untimely Malfunction | Instant | 8 | 52.2% | 4 |
| Burst Lightning | Instant | 8 | 52.2% | 4 |
| Llanowar Elves | Creature — Elf Druid | 5 | 51.4% | 3 |
| Lukka, Bound to Ruin | Legendary Planeswalker — Lukka | 8 | 51.2% | 2 |
| Rubblebelt Maverick | Creature — Human Detective | 20 | 50.6% | 8 |
| Bushwhack | Sorcery | 8 | 47.6% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Violent Urge than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrenn and Realmbreaker | Legendary Planeswalker — Wrenn | 3 | 6 | 66.7% | 64.3% | +2.3% |
| Cankerbloom | Creature — Phyrexian Fungus | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 65.6% | +1.1% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 6 | 70.6% | 70.1% | +0.5% |
| Seed of Hope | Instant | 1 | 6 | 66.7% | 66.7% | -0.0% |
| Keen-Eyed Curator | Creature — Raccoon Scout | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 66.7% | -0.0% |
| Patchwork Beastie | Artifact Creature — Beast | 1 | 6 | 66.7% | 66.7% | -0.0% |
| Wildfire Wickerfolk | Artifact Creature — Scarecrow | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 66.7% | -0.0% |
| Break Out | Sorcery | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 66.7% | -0.0% |
| Beastie Beatdown | Sorcery | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 66.7% | -0.0% |
| Omnivorous Flytrap | Creature — Plant | 3 | 5 | 66.7% | 66.7% | -0.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Delirium | 120 | 79.0% | 39.0% |
| Jund Delirium | 4 | 33.3% | 55.2% |
| Unclassified | 3 | 1.5% | 0.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.